Comparison

GC3 vs EYE XO2

A side-by-side look at how the Foresight Sports GC3 and Uneekor EYE XO2 compare on specs, accuracy, room requirements, and price. No hype — just the parts of the decision a buyer actually weighs.

GC3
PremiumForesight Sports
GC3$6,999

Industry-standard photometric accuracy. Used in club fitting and tour facilities. The 'buy once' pick for serious data work.

EYE XO2
PremiumUneekor
EYE XO2$10,999

Overhead mount means no repositioning between right and left-handed shots. Tour-grade data with the convenience of a permanent install.

Specifications

The numbers, lined up.

Hardware

  • Tracking Method
    GC3Photometric (Triscopic 3 cameras — same imaging stack as Bushnell Launch Pro)
    EYE XO2Photometric (3 cameras + IR, ceiling-mount)
  • Indoor/Outdoor
    GC3Both
    EYE XO2
  • Mount
    GC3
    EYE XO2Ceiling-mounted
  • Ambidextrous
    GC3
    EYE XO2Yes (no repositioning)
  • Hitting Zone
    GC3
    EYE XO228" × 21" — 300% larger than EYE XO

Data

  • Ball Data
    GC3Speed, launch, spin axis, carry, total
    EYE XO2Speed, launch, spin axis direct, carry
  • Club Data
    GC3Speed, path, face angle, AoA, dynamic loft
    EYE XO2Speed, path, face angle, AoA

Software

  • Subscription
    GC3None
    EYE XO2None
  • Software Included
    GC3FSX Play and FSX Pro (Players Plus)
    EYE XO2
  • Included Courses
    GC325 FSX courses
    EYE XO2
  • Mac/iOS
    GC3
    EYE XO2Windows-first

Requirements

  • Min Ceiling
    GC3
    EYE XO29 ft (9.5+ ideal)

Who each one is better for

Both fit the same buyers.

Neither one wins a persona the other doesn't. The choice comes down to specs, price, and room fit rather than buyer profile.

Both fit

  • Performance Seeker
  • Showroom
  • Family Setup

Build your simulator in two minutes

Five questions. One tailored build with retailer links.

We ask about your budget, your room, and how you’ll use it. We return a complete build — launch monitor, mat, enclosure, projector, software, PC — with the reasoning behind every pick and the alternatives we considered.