Skip to main content

Comparison

X3C vs Trackman 4

A side-by-side look at how the FlightScope X3C and Trackman 4 compare on specs, accuracy, room requirements, and price. No hype — just the parts of the decision a buyer actually weighs.

Side-by-side comparison
FlightScopeX3C$13,495
vs
TrackmanTrackman 4$25,995

When you buy through links on Northcourse, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read the full affiliate disclosure

Specifications

The numbers, lined up.

Hardware

  • Tracking Method
    X3CFusion Tracking — 3D Doppler radar + synchronized high-speed imaging
    Trackman 4Dual Doppler radar + synchronized high-speed camera (OERT)
  • Indoor/Outdoor
    X3CBoth
    Trackman 4Both, in any weather
  • Placement
    X3CFloor-placed behind the ball
    Trackman 4Floor-placed behind the ball; self-levelling
  • Weight
    X3C—
    Trackman 46.2 lb (2.8 kg)

Data

  • Data Parameters
    X3C~50, including face impact location, short game and putting
    Trackman 440+, including putting
  • Camera
    X3C—
    Trackman 4Radar-synchronized HDR, 720p at 60 fps

Requirements

  • Room Required
    X3C8–12 ft from sensor to tee for full swings
    Trackman 4—
  • Min Room Depth
    X3C—
    Trackman 416 ft (4.7 m) from unit to net indoors

Software

  • Software Included
    X3C12-course iOS E6 Connect licence
    Trackman 4—
  • Subscription
    X3CNone required on the hardware
    Trackman 4Trackman Performance Studio, roughly $1,100/yr

Who each one is better for

Both fit the same buyers.

Neither one wins a persona the other doesn’t. The choice comes down to specs, price, and room fit rather than buyer profile.

Both fit

  • Performance Seeker
  • Showroom

Build your simulator in two minutes

Five questions. One tailored build with retailer links.

We ask about your budget, your room, and how you’ll use it. We return a complete build — launch monitor, mat, enclosure, projector, software, PC — with the reasoning behind every pick and the alternatives we considered.