Skip to main content

Comparison

X3C vs GCQuad

A side-by-side look at how the FlightScope X3C and Foresight Sports GCQuad compare on specs, accuracy, room requirements, and price. No hype — just the parts of the decision a buyer actually weighs.

Side-by-side comparison
FlightScopeX3C$13,495
vs
Foresight Sports GCQuad
Foresight SportsGCQuad$15,999

Specifications

The numbers, lined up.

Hardware

  • Tracking Method
    X3CFusion Tracking — 3D Doppler radar + synchronized high-speed imaging
    GCQuadPhotometric (Quadrascopic 4-camera floor unit)
  • Indoor/Outdoor
    X3CBoth
    GCQuadBoth
  • Placement
    X3CFloor-placed behind the ball
    GCQuad—

Data

  • Data Parameters
    X3C~50, including face impact location, short game and putting
    GCQuad—
  • Ball Data
    X3C—
    GCQuadSpeed, launch, spin axis, carry, total — full direct measurement
  • Club Data
    X3C—
    GCQuadFull club delivery data

Requirements

  • Room Required
    X3C8–12 ft from sensor to tee for full swings
    GCQuad—

Software

  • Software Included
    X3C12-course iOS E6 Connect licence
    GCQuad—
  • Subscription
    X3CNone required on the hardware
    GCQuadNone required
  • Putting Add-on
    X3C—
    GCQuad$2,500

Pedigree

  • Used By
    X3C—
    GCQuadPGA Tour, club fitters

Who each one is better for

Both fit the same buyers.

Neither one wins a persona the other doesn’t. The choice comes down to specs, price, and room fit rather than buyer profile.

Both fit

  • Performance Seeker
  • Showroom

Build your simulator in two minutes

Five questions. One tailored build with retailer links.

We ask about your budget, your room, and how you’ll use it. We return a complete build — launch monitor, mat, enclosure, projector, software, PC — with the reasoning behind every pick and the alternatives we considered.