Skip to main content

Comparison

TH671ST vs LW352BST

When you buy through links on Northcourse, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read the full affiliate disclosure

A side-by-side look at how the BenQ TH671ST and Optoma LW352BST compare on specs, accuracy, room requirements, and price. No hype — just the parts of the decision a buyer actually weighs.

Buy TH671ST

Prices confirmed Nov 10, 2026 · we check every retailer daily

Buy LW352BST

Prices confirmed Nov 10, 2026 · we check every retailer daily

When you buy through links on Northcourse, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read the full affiliate disclosure

Full specificationsEvery spec for both, line by line

Specifications

The numbers, lined up.

Image

  • Resolution
    TH671ST1080p (1920×1080)
    LW352BSTWXGA (1280×800), 16:10
  • Lumens
    TH671ST3,000 ANSI
    LW352BST3,500 (ISO 21118)
  • Picture Mode
    TH671ST—
    LW352BSTGolf Sim Mode

Hardware

  • Light Source
    TH671STLamp, 240 W (4,000 h normal, 10,000 h eco/SmartEco, 15,000 h LampSave)
    LW352BST4LED (30,000 hours, eco mode)
  • Throw Ratio
    TH671ST0.69–0.83 (1.2× optical zoom)
    LW352BST0.72–0.86 (1.2× optical zoom)
  • Offset
    TH671ST102.5%; no lens shift
    LW352BST105% (±3%); no lens shift
  • Dimensions
    TH671ST11.65 × 8.82 × 4.72 in (W × D × H)
    LW352BST12.09 × 8.98 × 4.94 in (W × D × H, datasheet)

Requirements

  • Throw Distance
    TH671ST100 in at about 5.0–6.0 ft (BenQ's manual)
    LW352BST100 in (16:10) at about 5.1–6.1 ft, from the ratio

Room planner

See each one in your sim room.

The planner draws each unit to scale with your room and your swing: where it mounts, the throw it needs, and whether your shadow crosses the light. Put in your room once, then switch units in the planner to compare.

Build your simulator in two minutes

Five questions. One tailored build with retailer links.

We ask about your budget, your room, and how you’ll use it. We return a complete build — launch monitor, mat, enclosure, projector, software, PC — with the reasoning behind every pick and the alternatives we considered.